Citing, at least, THREE (3) of the sources from this module (my lectures must be one of your sources, and it is always a good idea to cite one of the readings):


*more sources included in PDF files

Explain how critical thinkers distinguish between science and pseudoscience. What are marks of pseudosciences? After reviewing the lecture and other materials in the module, do you think creationism should count as a pseudoscience? Why or why not? Make sure you discuss this in your own words. Don’t just summarize three sources; use the sources as evidence for your own ideas. Explain how engagement with the material altered and/or confirmed your initial thoughts on the topic. This response must be, at least, 250 words.

Informed Reflection: Pseudoscience